Notifications
Clear all
Back in the day, I was a strict hiking boot hiker. They needed to be big, bulky, and waterproof. But nowadays, I gravitate more towards hiking shoes. I like the fact that hiking shoes are lighter-weight and more breathable.
Which do you prefer: hiking boots or shoes?
Pros and cons of hiking boots
- Pros
- more ankle protection
- better in mud and shallow water
- Cons
- heavy and bulky
- more expensive
Pros and cons of hiking shoes
- Pros
- lightweight
- breathable
- Cons
- not always waterproof
What am I missing? Add to the list!
Topic starter
Posted : February 3, 2025 7:00 pm
Here's my take:
I choose lightweight and breathable over heavy and bulky, even in rough terrain. A good set of hiking shoes can handle the same terrain as boots. If I need waterproof or insulated, I'll buy the socks to compensate.
The only caveat is that hiking boots can provide some ankle support. But not as much as one would think.
Posted : February 5, 2025 7:59 pm